AusLeisure

Mohamed bin Hammam, the former President of the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) who challenged Sepp Blatter for the Presidency of world football governing body FIFA, has had his lifetime ban, imposed in August, annulled by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

However, the judgment was heavily qualified, stressing Bin Hammam had not been found innocent of providing the cash for $40,000 payments, which were handed out by the former FIFA executive committee member Jack Warner to delegates of the Caribbean Football Union (CFU), days before the election.

The three-man CAS panel emphasised only that it was "case not proven," because the evidence, compiled following FIFA's own investigation, was not sufficient to definitively prove Bin Hammam provided the suitcase full of dollar bills.

The CAS judgment found by a 2-1 majority, damagingly for Bin Hammam that "it is more likely than not that Mr Bin Hammam was the source of the monies and that his conduct may not have complied with the highest ethical standards that should govern the world of football and other sports."

CAS found, though, that the investigation carried out by FIFA, into the allegation that the $40,000 payments came from Bin Hammam, and were bribes to buy the CFU delegates' votes "was not complete or comprehensive enough."

Bin Hammam always argued that the FIFA action was mounted against him because he challenged Blatter for the Presidency, and that he would be cleared at CAS.

However, the judgment found that he had done nothing to trace the source of the dollars, adding "it is possible to infer that the failure of Mr Bin Hammam to carry out that relatively simple exercise might be explained by the fact that it would have confirmed that he was the source."

The exposure of the cash payments, to a gathering of CFU members in Trinidad called to hear a pitch by Bin Hammam for the Presidency, led to Bin Hammam withdrawing as a candidate.

That left the election clear for Blatter to be the only name on the ballot paper, and be voted four more years as FIFA President. FIFA's ethics committee then banned Bin Hammam from

FIFA activities for life, finding he had paid the money as bribes to buy votes, which was upheld by FIFA's appeal committee in September.

Despite the annulment of that ban, Bin Hammam cannot now restart his football activities, because earlier this week, he was provisionally suspended by the AFC, which alleged following an audit that there was evidence of gifts and bribery during his period as AFC President.

Following the CAS judgment, FIFA issued an immediate statement promising another investigation into Bin Hammam.

Stressing that "Mohamed Bin Hammam has not been proven innocent", FIFA promised to pass "all relevant files" to its newly-reconstituted ethics committee, to decide if "any action is required to be taken" against Bin Hammam.

The AFC's 30-day suspension relates to "possible violations" of AFC statutes, disciplinary code and code of ethics allegedly committed by Bin Hammam to the AFC General Secretary, who reported it to the organisation's disciplinary committee.

Related Articles

4th October 2011 - CAS dismisses Bin Hammam appeal

16th September 2011 - FIFA confirm Bin Hammam ban

27th July 2011 - Bin Hammam vows to fight FIFA life ban

24th July 2011 - FIFA bans Mohamed bin Hammam from football

23rd June 2011 - FIFA report claims ‘overwhelming’ evidence of Bin Hammam corruption

18th March 2011 - Bin Hammam confirms candidacy for FIFA Presidency

12th March 2010 - Qatar’s Bin Hammam faces tough fight for FIFA top job

---

Support our industry news service
We hope that you value the news that we publish so while you're here can we ask for your support?

As an independent publisher, we need reader support for our industry news gathering so ask that - if you don't already do so - you back us by subscribing to the printed Australasian Leisure Management magazine and/or our online news.